2019 FYEE Conference

An Investigation on the Effects of Supplemental Instruction and Just-in-Time Tutoring Methods on Student Success and Retention in First Year Engineering Course

Presented at T1B: Developing foundations in Science

The University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) embarked on a study to identify where their engineering students were struggling over three years ago in an effort to address student success, persistence, and retention. In this study, the committee identified that students were ill-equipped in engineering problem solving methodology and basic engineering computer programming. To address these concerns, a new course named Engineering Problem Solving was created utilizing the Student Centered Active Learning Environment with Upside-down Pedagogies (SCALE-Up) method. This class has aided in improving student retention and persistence in engineering. However, to further enhance this effect, Supplemental Instruction (SI) was added to the existing just-in-time tutoring model already being utilized in the class. This addition was made in an attempt to increase student success within the course, especially addressing the mathematically underprepared and underrepresented minority groups within UTA’s diverse engineering student body. SI provides a more structured studying environment in which students are led by a peer group mentor, known as an SI leader, in solving problems, receiving tips on good study habits, and other student success strategies. This is in contrast to the just-in-time tutoring sessions that are more “drop-in” in format, getting answer to specific questions the students have. This paper will assess the effects that these two different methods have on success rates in the course, defined as receiving an A, B, or C. Further, this paper will explore first semester retention data in order to assess the effects of these learning resources above the already effective retention rates shown in the class as a whole. Finally, this paper will explore the effect these methods have on particular student groups shown to struggle more in the class than their counterparts, including underprepared students, and underrepresented minorities. This paper will show all students benefit from these resources as evidenced by increased first semester retention and success rates.

  1. Dr. David Joseph Ewing University of Texas, Arlington [biography]
  2. Mrs. Catherine Mary Unite University of Texas at Arlington (UTA) [biography]
  3. Christina Natasha Miller University of Texas at Arlington [biography]
  4. Mr. Cedric Shelby University of Texas at Arlington [biography]
Download paper (307 KB)

Are you a researcher? Would you like to cite this paper? Visit the ASEE document repository at peer.asee.org for more tools and easy citations.